What has happened is that with the introduction of the concept of heterosexuality and homosexuality, the Forces of Heterosexualisation have redefined manhood as a sexual interest in men (with straight = heterosexual), actually its a definition made by the gays, who want to have complete control over man to man sexuality, not by straights.
With, this a man is not considered a masculine man, unless he has a woman next to him. And this makes men very insecure without the company of women, and that explains the straight rush for women.
Just look at all the advertisements on TV after Indian's heterosexualisation. Even an advertisement on male underwear always has a woman in it. The fear being generated is, if there's not a woman in your life, you won't be considered a man.
And likewise, lack of manhood is defined in terms of a sexual interest in men
September 30, 2008
The origins of Male Heterosexuality
It appears that the Christian society, in the middle ages, started to glorify man's love for women, and towards the beginning of the beginning of the modern era, men were expected to court women to marry -- instead of winning them in contests, etc. or through socially entered contracts as in the rest of the world.
This indirectly put a pressure on Western men to display an interest in women, and this "interest in women" indirectly became a source of power for Western men. But never so strongly, that it would lend itself into a separate concept in itself. As long as men's spaces were strong, that was not about to happen.
The concept of sexual interest in a particular 'sex' was invented from the top (by the rulers) and then forcibly made popular. And, it was not originally started for men's interest in women. The concept was originally started for man' sexual interest in men, in order to isolate and persecute it, as well as to misinform public view by making it seem 'feminine' by classifying third sex interest in receptive anal sex as 'man's sexual interest in men'.
The concept of a man's sexual interest in women, or heterosexuality came much later, and men's spaces just didn't accept the term so willingly. Not until, the new category of 'homosexuals' created by the rulers became very, very strong and created the term 'straight'.
However, even the term straight is not really accepted by men so willingly, even to this date, and is only used either by gays themselves to refer to the non-gays, or by men when they need to distinguish themselves from the gays (i.e. feminine gendered males who like men).
This indirectly put a pressure on Western men to display an interest in women, and this "interest in women" indirectly became a source of power for Western men. But never so strongly, that it would lend itself into a separate concept in itself. As long as men's spaces were strong, that was not about to happen.
The concept of sexual interest in a particular 'sex' was invented from the top (by the rulers) and then forcibly made popular. And, it was not originally started for men's interest in women. The concept was originally started for man' sexual interest in men, in order to isolate and persecute it, as well as to misinform public view by making it seem 'feminine' by classifying third sex interest in receptive anal sex as 'man's sexual interest in men'.
The concept of a man's sexual interest in women, or heterosexuality came much later, and men's spaces just didn't accept the term so willingly. Not until, the new category of 'homosexuals' created by the rulers became very, very strong and created the term 'straight'.
However, even the term straight is not really accepted by men so willingly, even to this date, and is only used either by gays themselves to refer to the non-gays, or by men when they need to distinguish themselves from the gays (i.e. feminine gendered males who like men).
Gays are a creation of the heterosexual society
Gays have been created by the society, by forcing men to disown their interest in intimacy with men, and letting meterosexual males in large numbers to become representatives of "men who like men".
September 25, 2008
The Western society wants complete eradication of man to man bonding
The modern Western society has waged a war against man to man sexuality like its a virus that needs to be completley eradicated from the men's population. The traditional society was content with suppressing this 'virus' so that it does not come in the way of marriage and reproduction, and did not need to be totally eradicated.
For this complete eradication of this 'virus' the Western society has created the strategy of quarantining man to man sexual need in the third sex 'homosexual' space, which has been specially created by the institution of science for this purpose.
However, in reality, its the Heterosexualisation which is really a disease. And the concept of sexual orientation, which needs to be fought by men.
But, how will they fight, as long as they are busy serving their oppressors for greed of the social powers granted by them.
Why not fight against this disease and snatch their powers to grant social manhood and power to us. Why not snatch our control of men's spaces from those Forces of Heterosexualisation? And be the masters of our own manhood and spaces.
For this complete eradication of this 'virus' the Western society has created the strategy of quarantining man to man sexual need in the third sex 'homosexual' space, which has been specially created by the institution of science for this purpose.
However, in reality, its the Heterosexualisation which is really a disease. And the concept of sexual orientation, which needs to be fought by men.
But, how will they fight, as long as they are busy serving their oppressors for greed of the social powers granted by them.
Why not fight against this disease and snatch their powers to grant social manhood and power to us. Why not snatch our control of men's spaces from those Forces of Heterosexualisation? And be the masters of our own manhood and spaces.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)