January 27, 2008

It is not only the male-male bonds that the heterosexual society denigrates by propagating it as 'unmanly' ... the heterosexual forces also degrade one of the other strongest -- in terms of nature -- human bonds: that of the mother and her son.
The western heterosexual society -- through its extremely powerful media and entertainment industry -- propagates it as unmanly, to be affectionate towards one's mother. A 'real' man -- as per the definition prescribed by these forces -- while sucks up to girlfriends, wants to keep an emotional/ social and physical distance from his mother. 
Men who are attached to their mothers are propagated as weaklings. However those that are attached to their girlfriends and allow themselves to be subdued by them are actually propagated as 'real' men (straights).

January 24, 2008

An example of how a man can be trained to dislike something he originally likes

I used to like the way the Americans spell words like Organization -- that is with a Z instead of S. The British English which we use in India goes "organisation", i.e. with an S.
Then I started working as an editor trainee in a magazine where they wanted to use only the British version, and I was told to look out for all words with "zation" or "zise" in the end and change it to "sation" and "sise", respectively. And, slowly, I learned to see the word as 'unacceptable', and stopped liking it.
Now, whenever I see the word organization or vandalize, immediately, a negative image comes to my mind

January 20, 2008

What is wrong with Heterosexualisation

An immense amount of social investment goes into manipulating and diverting human, especially male sexuality (and mutilating it in the process) towards reproduction -- in order to presumably 'benefit' the human society as a whole. 
Today, when we are positive that we do not need all that human population, and that we actually need to cut down, then investing in the mechanisms that force men to divert their sexuality towards women, and then forcing them to cut down reproduction is totally unexplainable.

January 19, 2008

Indian movies as the forebearers of heterosexualisation

The heterosexualisation process in modern India started with the advent of the Christian Britishers. And when they left, Nehru and others amongst the class of elite Indians who were in power and were extremely westernised and wanted to make India into 'Europe', started in their earnest to heterosexualisae the Indian society.
Heterosexuality was indeed contrary to the core of Indian culture and values. And, so when the Indian film industry started to copy the western heterosexual movies they seemed to contrary to what happened on the ground in the Indian society -- by portraying man-woman love -- and that too to such an extent that Indians associate movies with the story of love between a hero and a heroine. Every film must have a hero and a heroine, who fall in love and fight the society to be with each other. It has been the same thing for over 60 years of independance, and for Indians it is difficult to today imagine a movie which is based on anything else than a heterosexual love story. 
How contrary this was to not only the nature of humans, but the essence of Indian culture is clear from the fact that for many years in the beginning, people boycotted movies. For generations it was considered a characterlessness to go to view movies. But of course, and unfortunately, movies like media have a tremendous power to change the society, especially since it is so glamourous, and especially, because the powers that be were forcing the Indian society to westernise from all other quarters ... people's attitude towards movies changed, but love marriages did not become acceptable till about 25 years ago. Today, of course, it is a different story, eversince the third generation of the Nehru clan -- Rajiv Gandhi set about to greatly heterosexualise the Indian society. Today, of course, with the globalisation process he started, the forces of heterosexualisation are enforcing male-female sexual openness on our culture.

January 7, 2008

Freedom to Heterosexuality is death knell for men's spaces and this is extremely harmful for men and their rights. Since men's spaces are already crippled for thousands of years and unnatural Heterosexuality is their greatest enemy.

Heterosexuality is a sham

Everything about the Western concept of Heterosexuality is a lie, including its so-called 'homophobia'.

January 1, 2008

Post your notes on Heterosexualisation

You can post here your own observations about Heterosexualisation