Purpose of Western hostility

What the West calls 'homophobia', but what is basically a hatred of intimacy between men (not hatred of a certain kinds of men as in 'homosexuals'), is an artificially, rather unnaturally created, Western phenomena, whose primary purpose is to help masculine, 'normal' and regular men (what the west calls 'straight') suppress their own sexual needs for men, in order to heterosexualize themselves.

The secondary purpose of this phobia is to create a hostile condition in the men's spaces, where the pressure is constantly built up, so that the feelings of normal, regular, masculine (straight males) may never find the courage to express itself or even speak for itself, if by a chance, it escapes the inner suppression by the man himself.

To create this hatred in normal, regular masculine males, the attribute of desiring a man is associated with the effeminate, queer, third gender males (what the west calls, 'homosexuals' or 'gays'), so much so that the so-called western 'homophobia' is nothing but 'sissyphobia' (sic). You break this association of desiring men with efeminates, queers and homosexuals, and then there will be no stigma left about it.

Heterosexualized media unmindful of Indian sensibilities

The forces of heterosexualization that control the Indian media today show such sexual intimacy between men and women on TV, unmindful of how vulgar it seems, and how it hurts the Indian sensibilities, because they believe its a matter of sexual freedom.

However, the same heterosexual media, in the West, censors any depiction of sexuality between men citing the sensibilities of people. Like it censored the kissing scene in the film Philadelphia, or in Alexander the great.

The India heterosexualized media is just the same. In fact, on a discussion on why Valentine day should be allowed in India, the forces of heterosexualization maintained that they would not like 'homosexuals' to have freedom, even when they wanted freedom for heterosexuality, saying its not normal.

Just like in the West, Western freedom is not about sexual freedom per se, but about heterosexual freedom, where sexuality between men is allowed only in a marginalized, ghettoized, third gender space.

How is heterosexuality made possible?

If you learn to block your sexuality for men early on, and develop your sexuality for women, with enough pressures and encouragement from the society, and if throughout your life, there are enough pressures in the society to make sure that you never get to think about that suppressed sexuality for men, lying deep inside of you, then you can very well live as a 'heterosexual' man, considering, there are enough women to engage your sexual needs with, and absolutely no opportunity to engage in sexuality with a man without losing your manhood.

Points to ponder

Homosexuality and heterosexuality are cultural orientations of sexual needs, not biological orientation.

Evidence that in the eighteenth century Europe, men who had sex with the third sex (mollies) both were persecuted together without making a distinction between their identities, something which gave rise to the concept of 'homosexuality' which did not distinguish between men and third sex, nor between the penetrator and the penetrated.

"The Society organized the arrest and prosecution of Captain Rigby in 1698, which was the first time that anyone had actually laid plans and set a trap to capture a homosexual, and perhaps the first time that homosexuality itself, rather than sodomy in connection with rape or lack of consent or treason or other political motives, was the object of the prosecution. This trial prompted several satirical pamphlets, which brought homosexuals to wide public attention. The Society organized the rounding up of the first gang of mollies in Windsor in 1699, and a number of other prosecutions at the turn of the century. The Society publicly revealed homosexual meeting places in 1703."

The Gay Subculture in Early Eighteenth-Century London, Homosexuality in Eighteenth Century London, A sourcebook compiled by Rictor Norton

Peer Pressure is the key to the process of heterosexualization

From what I'm observing now, Peer-pressure seems to play the most important role in forcing heterosexulaization on males who have not been heterosexualized till they turn 19 or 20.

Males who had almost come to terms with their sexuality for men and found male partners, with whom they were intensely attached have been known to break these bonds and force themselves to have relationships with girls, after going through peer-pressure.

Peer-pressure needs to be understood more intensely, how it works, who controls them, who are the people who lead peer-pressure, and all that.

And of course, how to tackle it.