As long as manhood is defined as 'heterosexuality,' ... as long as the manhood category for males is defined as 'heterosexual' ... which means that as long as the west defines 'straight' = 'heterosexual,' ... men will not be able to raise their voice against heterosexuality or even show their discomfiture.
They will in fact be forced to claim that they enjoy it, or at best keep quiet, when those males who fit into heterosexualization of men's spaces brag that they enjoy it.
Showing posts with label Heterosexualization of society. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Heterosexualization of society. Show all posts
October 28, 2008
Destroying nature outside and inside
To create a society against nature requires huge investments in -- the more against nature you want to go, the more investment it requires.
It requires huge investment to destroy men's spaces (to heterosexualize them), and to create fear hostility in the new spaces against male-male intimacy -- both of the sexual and social kind. They achieved fear/ hostility against open male to male sexual intimacy long ago, due to which it had gone underground (primarily through investing heavily into religious doctrines that forbade it).
But since they couldn't create hostility against male to male social intimacy (like holding hands in public or hugging, embracing, kissing in public), male to male sexual bonds survived all these years amidst straight men in disguised forms, behind the scenes, but very much in the mainstream (straight) men's spaces.
They couldn't destroy male social intimacy back in the middle ages because it required investments of such huge magnitude that was not possible for the Forces of Heterosexualization back then. For one thing you needed to destroy men's spaces and to control them, which was just not possible, considering they were so strong. You had to remove all the injunctions against male-female non-marriage sex. In short you needed to reorganize the entire society -- against the grain of what comprises 'straight men'.
The Forces of Heterosexualization got this enormous financial power through industrialization in the modern world. This also gave them to create entirely new social spaces, which they heterosexualized from the very beginning. The forces of heterosexualization gained full control over the fruits of industrialization since its inception.
It's ironical that resources generated by destroying the nature outside (through industrialization) is used to destroy nature inside of men (by heterosexualizing them).
It requires huge investment to destroy men's spaces (to heterosexualize them), and to create fear hostility in the new spaces against male-male intimacy -- both of the sexual and social kind. They achieved fear/ hostility against open male to male sexual intimacy long ago, due to which it had gone underground (primarily through investing heavily into religious doctrines that forbade it).
But since they couldn't create hostility against male to male social intimacy (like holding hands in public or hugging, embracing, kissing in public), male to male sexual bonds survived all these years amidst straight men in disguised forms, behind the scenes, but very much in the mainstream (straight) men's spaces.
They couldn't destroy male social intimacy back in the middle ages because it required investments of such huge magnitude that was not possible for the Forces of Heterosexualization back then. For one thing you needed to destroy men's spaces and to control them, which was just not possible, considering they were so strong. You had to remove all the injunctions against male-female non-marriage sex. In short you needed to reorganize the entire society -- against the grain of what comprises 'straight men'.
The Forces of Heterosexualization got this enormous financial power through industrialization in the modern world. This also gave them to create entirely new social spaces, which they heterosexualized from the very beginning. The forces of heterosexualization gained full control over the fruits of industrialization since its inception.
It's ironical that resources generated by destroying the nature outside (through industrialization) is used to destroy nature inside of men (by heterosexualizing them).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)